![]() NEW THIS YEAR: adoption of SIGSOFT Open Science Policy! This year, ESEC/FSE has adopted the SIGSOFT Open Science Policy, and we encourage authors to provide a replication package. ![]() For full definitions of the research methods, see the SIGSOFT Empirical Standards. This will enable us to ensure reviewer expertise both for research methods and topics. ![]() NEW THIS YEAR: research methods declaration! This year, in addition to declaring the topics which are relevant for their submissions, authors will be asked to declare the research methods employed in their submissions. The same reviewers who requested major revisions will then assess whether the revised submission satisfies their requests adequately. In case a paper is deemed publishable upon major revision, authors are granted 8 weeks to perform major revisions, which might include additional experiments or new analyses of existing results major rewriting of algorithms and explanations clarifications, better scoping, and improved motivations. NEW THIS YEAR: major revisions allowed! The main novelty of this year’s review process is that the initial output can be accept, reject or major revision. We invite high-quality submissions, from both industry and academia, describing original and unpublished results of theoretical, empirical, conceptual, and experimental software engineering research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |